Welles animation theory

I’m not sure if Welles is arguing that orthodox animation is boring, but I think he is mainly just drawing a comparison.I think that the younger generation is ready to see experimental brought into the “mainstream.” A good way to initiate this is through experimental animation. I think that experimental animation is a great way to cultivate an interest in film. I think that kids appreciate experimental techniques more than adults do, because they think in terms of abstract imagination. This is especially true in recent Internet generations where young people have the world at their fingertips. By exposing kids or an audience to animations that are self aware, their understanding of shapes, colors, rhythm, sound, music and movement is being cultivated in a uniquely entertaining way. Drawing attention to the process can provoke a curiosity that will lead to countless new and exciting techniques.  Narrative cel animation can be appreciated for what it is, but just like with the Hollywood formula, newer audiences may begin to crave something more involved and less predictable. Disney is distinct for its narrative of a realistic fantasy, and Warner Brothers is distinct for its specific humor based on character conventions. Duck Amuck was an important crossover that played around with the idea that there is a person controlling the fate of Daffy Duck. I always thought this was clever, even if they just did it for a laugh. I think it’s great for the audience to feel included and people to walk away from a short film or animation feeling inspired, looking at everyday objects in different ways. I think it’s great when the viewer can experience the film along with the filmmaker. The animation that Welles talks about can transcend conventions and stand on its own.